Notice under Section 143(1)

Notice Under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

A Notice under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (India) is a preliminary intimation issued by the Income-tax Department to a taxpayer after they have filed their income tax return. It is not a notice for a detailed audit or assessment but rather a communication to inform the taxpayer about any adjustments made to their returned income based on prima facie checks, data matching, or inconsistencies identified during the initial processing of the return. This notice is a crucial step in the income tax return processing cycle, ensuring accuracy and compliance.

The Genesis of a Taxpayer’s Check-In

The Income-tax Act, 1961, governs the taxation of income in India. Section 143 deals with the assessment of income. While sub-sections like 143(2) and 143(3) refer to scrutiny assessments involving detailed examination of accounts and documents, Section 143(1) specifically addresses the process of “summary assessment” or “processing of return.” The introduction and subsequent amendments to Section 143(1) have aimed to streamline the tax return processing, making it more efficient and less burdensome for both the taxpayer and the tax authorities by automating initial checks and identifying obvious discrepancies.

Understanding the Notice: What’s Being Said?

The Notice under Section 143(1) is typically issued when the processing of the income tax return by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) reveals discrepancies or adjustments. The primary purpose is to inform the taxpayer of these changes, which can arise from several sources:

  • Discrepancies with Information Available with the Department: This is the most common reason. The tax department compares the income, deductions, and taxes claimed in the taxpayer’s return with information available to them, such as:
    • TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) or TCS (Tax Collected at Source) as reported by deductors/collectors in their statements (e.g., Form 26AS).
    • Information from financial institutions regarding interest income, capital gains, etc.
    • Information from other government agencies.

    If there’s a mismatch (e.g., income reported in the return is lower than what is reflected in Form 26AS, or deductions claimed are not supported by departmental data), an adjustment will be made.

  • Mathematical Errors: Errors in calculation of tax liability, interest, or refunds in the return filed by the taxpayer.
  • Unclaimed Adjustments: The taxpayer may have claimed certain adjustments or reliefs that are not permissible under the law or have not been properly substantiated.
  • Deductions/Exemptions Claimed Without Legal Basis: If a taxpayer claims a deduction or exemption that is not allowed as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act, this will be rectified.
  • Discrepancies in Returned Income vs. Assessed Income: The notice will clearly state the difference between the income declared by the taxpayer and the income as determined by the CPC after making necessary adjustments.

The notice will detail the specific adjustments made, the reasons for these adjustments, and the consequential impact on the taxpayer’s final tax liability, refund, or demand. It will also specify the amount of additional tax payable, if any, or the revised refund amount. Importantly, the taxpayer is given an opportunity to agree with the adjustments or provide reasons for disagreement.

Why is This Notice a Big Deal for Businesses?

For businesses, understanding and responding to a Notice under Section 143(1) is crucial for several reasons:

  • Financial Implications: Unattended notices can lead to a demand for additional tax, interest, and penalties. Prompt action can mitigate these financial burdens.
  • Compliance and Credibility: Timely response demonstrates the business’s commitment to tax compliance, maintaining a good standing with the tax authorities.
  • Preventing Escalation: Ignoring the notice can lead to more severe actions by the tax department, including scrutiny assessments and further legal proceedings.
  • Accuracy of Financial Records: It serves as a valuable feedback mechanism to identify errors or omissions in the business’s accounting and tax filing processes.
  • Cash Flow Management: A sudden demand for additional tax can impact a business’s working capital and cash flow. Understanding the notice allows for better financial planning.

Scenarios Where This Notice Comes into Play for Businesses

Businesses encounter notices under Section 143(1) in various situations related to their income tax filings:

  • Mismatch in TDS/TCS Claims: A business may have claimed TDS credit for a certain amount, but the corresponding details might not be perfectly reflected in the deductor’s statement or the department’s records.
  • Discrepancies in Reported Income: For example, if a business reports lower interest income from fixed deposits than what is reported by the bank to the tax department.
  • Errors in Claiming Deductions: Incorrectly claiming expenses as deductible or claiming deductions for which the conditions are not met.
  • Timing Differences in Revenue Recognition: If there’s a difference in how revenue is recognized for accounting purposes versus tax purposes.
  • Incorrect Calculation of Tax Liability: Simple arithmetic errors in computing the final tax due.
  • Changes in Tax Laws: Applying outdated tax provisions or misinterpreting new tax laws, leading to incorrect tax calculations.

Connected Concepts You Should Know

Several other terms and concepts are closely linked to a Notice under Section 143(1):

  • Income Tax Return (ITR): The primary document that triggers this notice.
  • CPC (Centralized Processing Centre): The entity responsible for processing tax returns and issuing these notices.
  • Form 26AS / AIS (Annual Information Statement): Crucial documents that provide a consolidated view of tax credits and financial transactions, often the source of discrepancies.
  • Scrutiny Assessment (Section 143(2) & 143(3)): A more in-depth examination of the tax return, which can follow if the taxpayer disagrees with the Section 143(1) adjustments or if other red flags are raised.
  • Intimation: The formal term used for the notice issued under Section 143(1).
  • Rectification of Mistakes (Section 154): A process to correct certain types of mistakes apparent from the record, which might be relevant if the taxpayer agrees with the department’s adjustments but believes there’s a further minor error.

Staying Ahead: The Latest on Section 143(1) Notices

The Income-tax Department continuously works to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the return processing system. Recent developments often focus on:

  • Advanced Data Analytics: Employing sophisticated algorithms to identify a wider range of discrepancies and potential tax evasion.
  • Pre-filled ITRs: Increased pre-filling of information in ITR forms based on departmental data aims to reduce manual errors and improve the accuracy of returns from the outset, potentially reducing the need for 143(1) adjustments for common discrepancies.
  • Digital Communication: A greater reliance on digital communication channels for issuing and responding to notices.
  • Faster Processing Times: Efforts to reduce the turnaround time for processing returns and issuing intimations.

Key Business Departments That Need to Be In the Loop

Several departments within a business are directly or indirectly affected by and should be aware of Section 143(1) notices:

  • Finance and Accounts Department: Responsible for preparing and filing tax returns, maintaining financial records, and managing tax payments. They are the primary custodians of the information that forms the basis of the return.
  • Tax Department/Tax Consultants: If a business has an in-house tax department or engages external tax consultants, these professionals are directly responsible for interpreting and responding to such notices.
  • Internal Audit Department: Can use these notices as a feedback mechanism to identify control weaknesses or process inefficiencies that led to the discrepancy.
  • Management/Board of Directors: For significant financial implications or potential compliance risks, senior management needs to be informed to make strategic decisions and ensure oversight.

The Road Ahead: Future Trends for Tax Processing

The evolution of tax administration in India is geared towards greater automation, transparency, and taxpayer convenience. Future trends concerning Section 143(1) and similar processes are likely to include:

  • Proactive Identification of Errors: More sophisticated predictive analytics and AI-driven tools to identify potential errors even before the return is filed.
  • Real-time Tax Compliance: A move towards more real-time reporting of transactions, which could further refine the data available to tax authorities and impact the nature of post-filing checks.
  • Personalized Taxpayer Services: Tailored guidance and communication based on individual taxpayer profiles and past compliance history.
  • Simplified Dispute Resolution: Streamlined processes for resolving discrepancies identified at the initial processing stage, reducing the need for prolonged litigation.
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Saurav Wadhwa

Co-founder & CEO

Saurav Wadhwa is the Co-founder and CEO of MYND Integrated Solutions. Saurav spearheads the company’s strategic vision—identifying new market opportunities, unfolding product and service catalogues, and driving business expansion across multiple geographies and functions. Saurav brings expertise in business process enablement and is a seasoned expert with over two decades of experience establishing and scaling Shared Services, Process Transformation, and Automation.

Saurav’s leadership and strategy expertise are backed by extensive hands-on involvement in Finance and HR Automation, People and Business Management and Client Relationship Management. Over his career, he has played a pivotal role in accelerating the growth of more than 800 businesses across diverse industries, leveraging innovative automation solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs.

Before becoming CEO, Saurav spent nearly a decade at MYND focusing on finance and accounting outsourcing. His background includes proficiency in major ERP systems like SAP, Oracle, and Great Plains, and he has a proven track record of optimizing global finance operations for domestic and multinational corporations.

Under Saurav’s leadership, MYND Integrated Solutions maintains a forward-thinking culture—prioritizing continuous learning, fostering ethical practices, and embracing next-generation technologies such as RPA and AI-driven analytics. He is committed to strategic partnerships, long-term business development, and stakeholder transparency, ensuring that MYND remains at the forefront of the BPM industry.

A firm believer that “Leadership and Learning are indispensable to each other,” Saurav consistently seeks new ways to evolve MYND’s capabilities and empower clients with best-in-class business process solutions.

Vivek Misra

Founder & Group MD

Vivek is the founder of MYND Integrated Solutions. He is a successful entrepreneur with a strong background in Accounts and Finance. An alumnus of Modern School and Delhi University, Vivek has also undertaken prestigious courses on accountancy with Becker and Business 360 management course with Columbia Business School, US.

Vivek is currently the Founder & Group MD of MYND Integrated Solutions. With over 22 years of experience setting up shared service centres and serving leading companies in the Manufacturing, Services, Retail and Telecom industries, his strong industry focus and client relationships have quickly enabled MYND to build credibility with 500+ clients. MYND has developed a niche in Shared services in India’s Finance and Accounting (FAO) and Human Resources (HR). MYND has also taken Solutions and services to the international space, offering multi-country services on a single platform under his leadership. Vivek has been instrumental in fostering mutually beneficial partnerships with global service providers, immensely benefiting MYND.

Mynd also forayed into a niche Fintech space with the setup of the M1xchange under the auspices of the RBI licence granted to only 3 companies across India. The exchange is changing the traditional field of bill discounting by bringing the entire process online along with the participation of banks through online auctioning.

Sundeep Mohindru

Founder Director

Sundeep initiated Mynd with a small team of just five people in 2002 and has been instrumental in steering it to evolve into a knowledge management company. He has brought about substantial improvements in growth, profitability, and performance, which has helped Mynd achieve remarkable customer, employee and stakeholder satisfaction. He has been involved in creating specialized service delivery models suitable for diverse client needs and has always created a new benchmark for Mynd and its team. Under his leadership, Mynd has developed niche products and implemented them on an all India scale for superior services. Mynd has been servicing a large number of multinational companies in India through its on-shore and off-shore model.

TReDS (Trade Receivable Discounting System) has been nurtured from a concept stage by Sundeep and the Mynd team. M1xchange, Mynd Online National Exchange for Receivables was successfully launched on April 7th, 2017. While spearheading the project, Sundeep and his team have built up the TReDS platform to meet RBI guidelines and enhance the transparency for all stakeholders. This platform and related service has the capability of transforming the way the receivable finance and other supply chain finance solutions are operating currently.

Sundeep is currently focused on providing strategic direction to the company and is working towards achieving high growth for Mynd, which will help in creating the products as per customer needs and increase its top line while maintaining the bottom line. He directly involves, develops, nurtures and manages all key client relationships of Mynd. He has also successfully acquired numerous preferred partners to support Mynd’s technology-based endeavors and scale up its business.

Sundeep has been the on the Board of Directors for many renowned companies. He has played a key role in planning the entry strategy and has set up subsidiaries for many multinational companies in India. In his leadership, Mynd has seen consistent growth at the rate of 20+ % CAGR from the year 2009 onwards. This was primarily because of investing into technology and bringing platform based offering in Accounting and HR domain for the customers.